Researchers have long looked to parental income as a key factor in determining intergenerational mobility. However, parental income is not fixed over time, and parental expenditures on children change as a child ages, from predominantly food, health, and shelter when a child is young, for example, to education and neighborhoods through adolescence. As this new research reveals, taking a trajectories-based approach to income and expenditures delivers important new insights into intergenerational mobility.

The authors’ trajectories-based approach allows them to link parental income at each offspring age to the child’s future permanent income. Among other features of the authors’ methodology, their approach offers more precision when measuring age-specific parental income effects (please see the working paper for more details). The authors find the following:

  • There is clear evidence that a child’s permanent income is sensitive to the timing of parental income: parental incomes in middle and late adolescence are associated with larger marginal effects on predicted offspring income than earlier parental income years. This is owing, at least in part, to the increasing role of education and social influences.  
  • The mobility process has changed across cohorts defined as births in 1967-1970, 1971-1973, and 1974-1977: the effects of a permanent parental income starting at birth are larger for the earliest cohort compared to the two later ones. In other words, the sensitivity of offspring to income in later childhood and adolescence seems to have declined relative to the first cohort. 
  • The authors uncover interactions between incomes at different ages as a distinct determinant of a child’s permanent income on parental income trajectories. In doing so, they find evidence of interactions between parental incomes at different ages in terms of their effects on children. 
  • Finally, in an important confirmation of their income results, the authors find that family income trajectories exhibit similar influences on education as they do for income; however, their results for occupations are mixed and imprecise. 

Bottom line: Parental income plays different roles over the life of a child and, likewise, has different effects at given ages. This work reveals how the measurement of intergenerational mobility is enhanced by a consideration of how the dynamics of family income over childhood and adolescence predict adult outcomes. Importantly, for those interested in the role of parental income in intergenerational mobility, this work suggests an especially important role for incomes in adolescence. 

More on this topic

Research Briefs·May 23, 2024

Can You Erase the Mark of a Criminal Record? Labor Market Impacts of Criminal Record Remediation

Amanda Y. Agan,  Andrew Garin, Dmitri K. Koustas, Alexandre Mas, and Crystal Yang
Removing a previously obtained criminal record does not improve labor market outcomes, on average, with the notable exception of participation in gig work through online platforms.
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
Research Briefs·Apr 23, 2024

Early Predictors of Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice Involvement

Andrew Jordan, Ezra Karger, and Derek Neal
Detailed measures of early academic achievement and socioeconomic status are powerful predictors of future criminal justice involvement; however, while reforms that improve school quality and neighborhood environments are likely to reduce future racial disparities in criminal justice involvement, such improvements...
Topics: Early Childhood Education, Economic Mobility & Poverty, Higher Education & Workforce Training
Research Briefs·Apr 18, 2024

Does Nothing Stop a Bullet Like a Job? The Effects of Income on Crime

Jens Ludwig and Kevin Schnepel
Policies that reduce economic desperation reduce property crime (and hence overall crime rates) but have little effect on violent crime.
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty