Globally, 2.8 billion people breathe hazardous air and 1.5 billion contend with polluted water, with severe impacts on health, labor productivity, and welfare. One way that governments address this problem is to collect and disclose firm-level emissions data, which allows regulators and citizens to identify violators of environmental standards. Even so, many polluters go unpunished as governments routinely fail to achieve compliance with their own standards.
As the world’s largest polluter and manufacturer, and as one of many countries that suffer from imperfect environmental compliance, China offers an instructive example. China manages one of the few and largest systems in the world to automatically collect hourly emissions data and to disclose that data publicly in real time. Emissions from 25,000 major polluting plants covering more than 75 percent of the country’s total industrial emissions, are publicly listed on a website. Despite that excessive polluters have nowhere to hide, in 2019 more than 33 percent of the CEMS firms committed pollution violations.
Why is non-compliance prevalent when regulators can accurately identify violations? Regulatory challenges abound, including resource-intensive onsite investigations that are required to issue fines or shutdowns. Local governments not only face resource constraints, but given the economic costs of punishments, there is also the possibility that large polluters will defy or even capture local regulators.
Enter China’s citizens. The country has created official channels for the public to report violations of standards and to pressure regulators, while environmentalists and NGOs are increasingly leveraging social media platforms to call for actions against polluters. This type of citizen involvement in environmental governance is an idea that is gaining momentum, but questions remain about whether and how citizen participation in environmental governance can improve environmental outcomes.
To investigate this bottom-up approach, the authors conducted an eight-month experiment across China. Using data to identify violating firms, they randomly assigned firms to either an experimentally assigned control group, or one of several treatment groups, and recruited citizen volunteers to file messages appealing for action when firms in the treatment group violated pollution standards. Citizen volunteers filed either private appeals (i.e., calling a government hotline or sending a private message to a government official or firm) or public appeals sent through the popular Twitter-like Chinese social media site Weibo, potentially observable by more than 500 million users. For all pollution appeals, a script was provided to ensure that content and wording were comparable, but not identical, across channels. The researchers found the following:
Bottom line: Engaging the public in efforts to reduce pollution can significantly reduce air and water pollution. Additionally, social media is a powerful tool to facilitate citizen involvement in policy implementation and to hold regulators accountable. And these lessons extend beyond China to include countries like the United States, Canada, India, Indonesia, and others looking to citizen engagement to overcome environmental enforcement challenges.