Using a large-scale survey of U.S. consumers, we study how the large one-time transfers to individuals from the CARES Act affected their consumption, saving and labor-supply decisions. Most respondents report that they primarily saved or paid down debts with their transfers, with only about 15 percent reporting that they mostly spent it. When providing a detailed breakdown of how they used their checks, individuals report having spent or planning to spend only around 40 percent of the total transfer on average. This relatively low rate of spending out of a one-time transfer is higher for those facing liquidity constraints, who are out of the labor force, who live in larger households, who are less educated and those who received smaller amounts. We find no meaningful effect on labor-supply decisions from these transfer payments, except for twenty percent of the unemployed who report that the stimulus payment made them search harder for a job.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Jul 31, 2019

The Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks in a Heterogeneous Production Economy

Ernesto Pasten, Raphael Schoenle, Michael Weber
Topics:  Monetary Policy, Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper Mar 27, 2018

Historical Antisemitism, Ethnic Specialization, and Financial Development

Francesco D'Acunto, Michael Weber, Marcel Prokopczuk
Topics:  Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper Aug 3, 2018

Price Rigidity and the Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations

Ernesto Pasten, Raphael Schoenle, Michael Weber
Topics:  Fiscal Studies, Monetary Policy