We use micro data on earnings together with the details of each state’s UI system under the CARES Act to compute the entire distribution of current UI benefits. The median replacement rate is 134%. Two-thirds of UI eligible workers can receive benefits which exceed lost earnings and one-fifth can receive benefits at least double lost earnings. There is sizable variation in the effects of the CARES Act across occupations and states, with important distributional consequences. We show how alternative UI expansion policies would change the distribution of UI benefits and thus affect resulting liquidity provision, progressivity, and labor supply incentives.

 

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Jan 16, 2018

How Do Changes In Housing Voucher Design Affect Rent and Neighborhood Quality?

Peter Ganong, Robert Collinson
Topics:  Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages, Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper Dec 12, 2019

The Rise of Niche Consumption

Brent Neiman, Joseph S. Vavra
BFI Working Paper Aug 23, 2018

Liquidity vs. Wealth in Household Debt Obligations: Evidence from Housing Policy in the Great Recession

Peter Ganong, Pascal Noel
Topics:  Fiscal Studies, Financial Markets, Employment & Wages, Economic Mobility & Poverty, Monetary Policy, COVID-19