We conducted a nationwide field experiment in China to evaluate the direct and indirect impacts of assigning firms to public or private citizen appeals when they violate pollution standards. There are three main findings. First, public appeals to the regulator through social media substantially reduce violations and pollution emissions, while private appeals cause more modest environmental improvements. Second, public appeals appear to tilt regulators’ focus away from facilitating economic growth and toward avoiding pollution-induced public unrest. Third, pollution reductions by treated firms are not offset by control firms, based on randomly varying the proportion of treatment firms at the prefecture-level. 

INTERACTIVE MAP

 

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Sep 16, 2024

Climate Capitalists

Niels Gormsen, Kilian Huber, and Sangmin Simon Oh
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Aug 26, 2024

Filling the Governance Gap: Corporate Commitments and Environmental Externalities in the African Oil Sector

Samuel Chang, Hans Christensen, and Andrew McKinley
Topics: Development Economics, Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Aug 20, 2024

Toward an Understanding of the Economics of Prosumers: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment

John List, Ioannis Pragidis, and Michael K. Price
Topics: Energy & Environment