We conducted a nationwide field experiment in China to evaluate the direct and indirect impacts of assigning firms to public or private citizen appeals when they violate pollution standards. There are three main findings. First, public appeals to the regulator through social media substantially reduce violations and pollution emissions, while private appeals cause more modest environmental improvements. Second, public appeals appear to tilt regulators’ focus away from facilitating economic growth and toward avoiding pollution-induced public unrest. Third, pollution reductions by treated firms are not offset by control firms, based on randomly varying the proportion of treatment firms at the prefecture-level. 

INTERACTIVE MAP

 

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 21, 2026

Green Subsidies with Demand Distortions

Susanna B. Berkouwer and Joshua Dean
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Sep 16, 2026

Evaluating the Spatial Consequences of a Climate Tipping Point

José-Luis Cruz, Klaus Desmet, and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Jun 18, 2026

Paying for Power

Fiona Burlig and Anant Sudarshan
Topics: Energy & Environment