We conducted a nationwide field experiment in China to evaluate the direct and indirect impacts of assigning firms to public or private citizen appeals when they violate pollution standards. There are three main findings. First, public appeals to the regulator through social media substantially reduce violations and pollution emissions, while private appeals cause more modest environmental improvements. Second, public appeals appear to tilt regulators’ focus away from facilitating economic growth and toward avoiding pollution-induced public unrest. Third, pollution reductions by treated firms are not offset by control firms, based on randomly varying the proportion of treatment firms at the prefecture-level. 

INTERACTIVE MAP

 

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jun 16, 2026

The Local Damages from Global Climate Change

Tamma Carleton, Michael Greenstone, Solomon Hsiang, Andrew Hultgren, Robert E. Kopp, Kelly E. McCusker, Ishan Nath, James Rising, and Ashwin Rode
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·May 18, 2026

Valuing Disaster Prevention: Desert Locust Monitoring and Control

Joséphine Gantois, Anouch Missirian, Evelina Linnros, Anna Tompsett, Amir Jina, Gordon C. McCord, and Eyal Frank
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·May 12, 2026

Sentiment and Environmental Performance

George M. Constantinides and Maurizio Montone
Topics: Energy & Environment