We conducted a nationwide field experiment in China to evaluate the direct and indirect impacts of assigning firms to public or private citizen appeals when they violate pollution standards. There are three main findings. First, public appeals to the regulator through social media substantially reduce violations and pollution emissions, while private appeals cause more modest environmental improvements. Second, public appeals appear to tilt regulators’ focus away from facilitating economic growth and toward avoiding pollution-induced public unrest. Third, pollution reductions by treated firms are not offset by control firms, based on randomly varying the proportion of treatment firms at the prefecture-level. 

INTERACTIVE MAP

 

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Apr 15, 2025

Can Pollution Markets Work in Developing Countries? Experimental Evidence from India

Michael Greenstone, Rohini Pande, Nicholas Ryan, and Anant Sudarshan
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Mar 10, 2025

The Value of Clean Water: Experimental Evidence from Rural India

Fiona Burlig, Amir Jina, and Anant Sudarshan
Topics: Development Economics, Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Jan 28, 2025

Drive Down the Cost: Learning by Doing and Government Policies in the Global EV Battery Industry

Panle Jia Barwick, Hyuk-soo Kwon, Shanjun Li Nahim, and Bin Zahur
Topics: Energy & Environment, Technology & Innovation