Research / BFI Working PaperMar 21, 2022

Anomaly or Possible Risk Factor? Simple-To-Use Tests

Benjamin Holcblat, Abraham Lioui, Michael Weber

Basic asset pricing theory predicts high expected returns are a compensation for risk. However, high expected returns might also constitute anomalies due to frictions or behavioral biases. We propose two complementary simple-to-use tests to assess whether risk can explain differences in expected returns. We provide general theoretical equilibrium foundations for the tests and show their properties in simulations. The tests take into account risks disliked by risk-averse individuals, including high-order moments and tail risks. None of the tests rely on the validity of a factor model nor other parametric statistical models. Empirically, we find risk cannot explain a large majority of variables predicting differences in expected returns. In particular, value, momentum, operating profitability, and investment appear to be anomalies.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Sep 15, 2019

Monetary Policy Communications and their Effects on Household Inflation Expectations

Olivier Coibion, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, Michael Weber
Topics:  Monetary Policy, Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages, Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper Mar 2, 2020

Gender Roles and the Gender Expectations Gap

Francesco D'Acunto, Ulrike Malmendier, Michael Weber
Topics:  Monetary Policy
BFI Working Paper Feb 10, 2020

Forward Guidance and Household Expectations

Olivier Coibion, Dimitris Georgarakos, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, Michael Weber
Topics:  Uncategorized