Research / BFI Working PaperMar 21, 2022

Anomaly or Possible Risk Factor? Simple-To-Use Tests

Benjamin Holcblat, Abraham Lioui, Michael Weber

Basic asset pricing theory predicts high expected returns are a compensation for risk. However, high expected returns might also constitute anomalies due to frictions or behavioral biases. We propose two complementary simple-to-use tests to assess whether risk can explain differences in expected returns. We provide general theoretical equilibrium foundations for the tests and show their properties in simulations. The tests take into account risks disliked by risk-averse individuals, including high-order moments and tail risks. None of the tests rely on the validity of a factor model nor other parametric statistical models. Empirically, we find risk cannot explain a large majority of variables predicting differences in expected returns. In particular, value, momentum, operating profitability, and investment appear to be anomalies.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Mar 25, 2021

The Effect of Macroeconomic Uncertainty on Household Spending

Olivier Coibion, Dimitris Georgarakos, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, Geoff Kenny, Michael Weber
Topics:  Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper Nov 9, 2017

The Information Content of Dividends: Safer Profits, Not Higher Profits

Michael Weber, Roni Michaely, Stefano Rossi
Topics:  Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper Aug 3, 2018

Price Rigidity and the Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations

Ernesto Pasten, Raphael Schoenle, Michael Weber
Topics:  Fiscal Studies, Monetary Policy