We contribute a theory in which three channels interact to determine the degree of monopsony power and therefore the wedge between a worker’s spot wage and her marginal product (henceforth, the wage markdown): (1) heterogeneity in worker-firm-specific preferences (nonwage amenities), (2) firm granularity, and (3) off- and on-the-job search frictions. We use Norwegian data to discipline each channel and then reproduce novel reduced-form empirical relationships between market concentration, job flows, wages and wage inequality. Our main exercise quantifies the contribution of each channel to income inequality and wage markdowns. The markdowns are 21 percent in our baseline estimation. Removing nonwage amenity dispersion narrows them by a third. Giving the next-lowest-ranked competitor a seat at the bargaining table narrows them by half. Removing search frictions narrows them by two-thirds. Each counterfactual shows decreased wage inequality and increased welfare.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·May 19, 2025

Remote Work, Employee Mix, and Performance

Cevat Giray Aksoy, Nicholas Bloom, Steven Davis, Victoria Marino, and Cem Özgüzel
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·May 13, 2025

Meaning at Work

Nava Ashraf, Oriana Bandiera, Virginia Minni, and Luigi Zingales
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Apr 23, 2025

Evaluating Recent Crackdowns on Disability Benefits: Effects on Income and Health Care Use in Australia

Manasi Deshpande, Greg Kaplan, and Tobias Leigh-Wood
Topics: Employment & Wages, Health care