We document very low take‐up of an energy efficiency program that is widely believed to be privately beneficial. Program participants receive a substantial home “weatherization” retrofit; all installation and equipment costs are covered by the program. Less than one percent of presumptively eligible households take up the program in the control group. This rate increased only modestly after we took extraordinary efforts to inform households ‐ via multiple channels ‐ about the sizable benefits and zero monetary costs. These findings are consistent with high non‐monetary costs associated with program participation and/or energy efficiency investments.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Sep 8, 2024

Incentives to Vaccinate

Pol Campos-Mercade, Armando N. Meier, Stephan Meier, Devin Pope, Florian H. Schneider, and Erik Wengström
Topics: Health care
BFI Working Paper·Aug 26, 2024

Filling the Governance Gap: Corporate Commitments and Environmental Externalities in the African Oil Sector

Samuel Chang, Hans Christensen, and Andrew McKinley
Topics: Development Economics, Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Aug 20, 2024

Toward an Understanding of the Economics of Prosumers: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment

John List, Ioannis Pragidis, and Michael K. Price
Topics: Energy & Environment