We document very low take‐up of an energy efficiency program that is widely believed to be privately beneficial. Program participants receive a substantial home “weatherization” retrofit; all installation and equipment costs are covered by the program. Less than one percent of presumptively eligible households take up the program in the control group. This rate increased only modestly after we took extraordinary efforts to inform households ‐ via multiple channels ‐ about the sizable benefits and zero monetary costs. These findings are consistent with high non‐monetary costs associated with program participation and/or energy efficiency investments.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Aug 24, 2026

The Effects of SNAP Sugary Drink Restrictions on Consumption and Welfare

Hunt Allcott, Amy Finkelstein, Anna Grummon, and Matthew Notowidigdo
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Health care
BFI Working Paper·Jun 18, 2026

Paying for Power

Fiona Burlig and Anant Sudarshan
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Jun 16, 2026

The Local Damages from Global Climate Change

Tamma Carleton, Michael Greenstone, Solomon Hsiang, Andrew Hultgren, Robert E. Kopp, Kelly E. McCusker, Ishan Nath, James Rising, and Ashwin Rode
Topics: Energy & Environment