We document very low take‐up of an energy efficiency program that is widely believed to be privately beneficial. Program participants receive a substantial home “weatherization” retrofit; all installation and equipment costs are covered by the program. Less than one percent of presumptively eligible households take up the program in the control group. This rate increased only modestly after we took extraordinary efforts to inform households ‐ via multiple channels ‐ about the sizable benefits and zero monetary costs. These findings are consistent with high non‐monetary costs associated with program participation and/or energy efficiency investments.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Aug 1, 2015

Toilets Can Work: Short and Medium Run Health Impacts of Addressing Complementarities and Externalities in Water and Sanitation

Michael Greenstone, Esther Duflo, Raymond Guiteras, Thomas Clasen
Topics:  Energy & Environment, Healthcare
BFI Working Paper Sep 11, 2017

New Evidence on the Impact of Sustained Exposure to Air Pollution on Life Expectancy from China’s Huai River Policy

Michael Greenstone, Avraham Ebenstein, Maoyong Fan, Guojun He, Maigeng Zhou
Topics:  Energy & Environment, Healthcare
BFI Working Paper Jan 1, 2016

Will We Ever Stop Using Fossil Fuels?

Thomas Covert, Michael Greenstone, Christopher R. Knittel
Topics:  Energy & Environment, Financial Markets, Monetary Policy, Tax & Budget, Healthcare