We document very low take‐up of an energy efficiency program that is widely believed to be privately beneficial. Program participants receive a substantial home “weatherization” retrofit; all installation and equipment costs are covered by the program. Less than one percent of presumptively eligible households take up the program in the control group. This rate increased only modestly after we took extraordinary efforts to inform households ‐ via multiple channels ‐ about the sizable benefits and zero monetary costs. These findings are consistent with high non‐monetary costs associated with program participation and/or energy efficiency investments.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·May 18, 2026

Valuing Disaster Prevention: Desert Locust Monitoring and Control

Joséphine Gantois, Anouch Missirian, Evelina Linnros, Anna Tompsett, Amir Jina, Gordon C. McCord, and Eyal Frank
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·May 12, 2026

Sentiment and Environmental Performance

George M. Constantinides and Maurizio Montone
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·May 11, 2026

Global Policy Spillovers: How Environmental Policies Propagate through Product Attributes

Koichiro Ito, James M. Sallee, and Andrew Smith
Topics: Energy & Environment