We document very low take‐up of an energy efficiency program that is widely believed to be privately beneficial. Program participants receive a substantial home “weatherization” retrofit; all installation and equipment costs are covered by the program. Less than one percent of presumptively eligible households take up the program in the control group. This rate increased only modestly after we took extraordinary efforts to inform households ‐ via multiple channels ‐ about the sizable benefits and zero monetary costs. These findings are consistent with high non‐monetary costs associated with program participation and/or energy efficiency investments.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper May 9, 2019

Do Renewable Portfolio Standards Deliver?

Michael Greenstone, Ishan Nath
Topics:  Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper Mar 25, 2020

Does Social Distancing Matter?

Michael Greenstone, Vishan Nigam
Topics:  COVID-19
BFI Working Paper Dec 20, 2016

The Local Economic and Welfare Consequences of Hydraulic Fracturing

Michael Greenstone, Alexander W. Bartik, Janet Currie, Christopher R. Knittel
Topics:  Energy & Environment, Health care