The recent Supreme Court decision NCAA vs Alston (June 2021) has heightened interest in the benefits and costs of participation in sports for student athletes. Anecdotes about the exploitation of student athletes were cited in the opinion. This paper uses panel data for two different cohorts that follow students from high school through college and into their post-school pursuits to examine the generality of these anecdotes. On average, student athletes’ benefit- often substantially so—in terms of graduation, post-collegiate employment, and earnings. Benefits in terms of social mobility for disadvantaged and minority students are substantial, contrary to the anecdotes in play in the media and in the courts.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jun 23, 2026

An Informational Rationale for Viewpoint Neutrality in Education

Georgy Egorov and Konstantin Sonin
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training
BFI Working Paper·Jun 16, 2026

Beliefs and Actions under Government Policy Uncertainty: Evidence from Student Loan Forgiveness

Dmitri Koustas, Michael Weber, and Constantine Yannelis
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training
BFI Working Paper·Jun 10, 2026

The Enjoyment Paradox: College-Educated Mothers Invest More in Their Children’s Learning and Enjoy It Less

Ariel Kalil, Haoxuan Liu, and Ritika Sethi
Topics: Early Childhood Education, Employment & Wages, Higher Education & Workforce Training