The recent Supreme Court decision NCAA vs Alston (June 2021) has heightened interest in the benefits and costs of participation in sports for student athletes. Anecdotes about the exploitation of student athletes were cited in the opinion. This paper uses panel data for two different cohorts that follow students from high school through college and into their post-school pursuits to examine the generality of these anecdotes. On average, student athletes’ benefit- often substantially so—in terms of graduation, post-collegiate employment, and earnings. Benefits in terms of social mobility for disadvantaged and minority students are substantial, contrary to the anecdotes in play in the media and in the courts.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Mar 17, 2026

Household Preferences for Women’s Employment: A Field Experiment in Bangladesh

Yueh-ya Hsu, Reshmaan N. Hussam, Erin M. Kelley, and Gregory Lane
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages, Higher Education & Workforce Training
BFI Working Paper·Mar 16, 2026

Attention (And Money) Is All You Need: Why Universities Are Struggling to Keep AI Talent

Ufuk Akcigit, Craig A. Chikis, Emin Dinlersoz, and Nathan Goldschlag
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training, Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Jan 27, 2026

College Major Choice, Payoffs, and Gender Gaps

Christopher Campos, Pablo Muñoz, Alonso Bucarey, and Dante Contreras
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training