The introduction of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) allows the central bank to engage in large-scale intermediation by competing with private financial intermediaries for deposits. Yet, since a central bank is not an investment expert, it cannot invest in long-term projects itself, but relies on investment banks to do so. We derive an equivalence result that shows that absent a banking panic, the set of allocations achieved with private financial intermediation will also be achieved with a CBDC. During a panic, however, we show that the rigidity of the central bank’s contract with the investment banks has the capacity to deter runs. Thus, the central bank is more stable than the commercial banking sector. Depositors internalize this feature ex-ante, and the central bank arises as a deposit monopolist, attracting all deposits away from the commercial banking sector. This monopoly might endangered maturity transformation.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper May 8, 2018

The Dynamics of Sovereign Debt Crises and Bailouts

Francisco Roch, Harald Uhlig
Topics:  Fiscal Studies, Monetary Policy
BFI Working Paper Jul 1, 2011

Economics and Reality

Topics:  Fiscal Studies, Monetary Policy
BFI Working Paper Aug 20, 2019

Cryptocurrencies, Currency Competition, and the Impossible Trinity

Pierpaolo Benigno, Linda M. Schilling, Harald Uhlig
Topics:  Financial Markets