The introduction of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) allows the central bank to engage in large-scale intermediation by competing with private financial intermediaries for deposits. Yet, since a central bank is not an investment expert, it cannot invest in long-term projects itself, but relies on investment banks to do so. We derive an equivalence result that shows that absent a banking panic, the set of allocations achieved with private financial intermediation will also be achieved with a CBDC. During a panic, however, we show that the rigidity of the central bank’s contract with the investment banks has the capacity to deter runs. Thus, the central bank is more stable than the commercial banking sector. Depositors internalize this feature ex-ante, and the central bank arises as a deposit monopolist, attracting all deposits away from the commercial banking sector. This monopoly might endangered maturity transformation.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Dec 16, 2024

Toward an Understanding of the Political Economy of Using Field Experiments in Policymaking

Guglielmo Briscese and John List
Topics: Monetary Policy
BFI Working Paper·Jul 10, 2024

Destabilizing Digital “Bank Walks”

Naz Koont, Tano Santos, and Luigi Zingales
Topics: Monetary Policy
BFI Working Paper·Jun 11, 2024

Bankruptcy Resolution and Credit Cycles

Martin Kornejew, Chen Lian, Yueran Ma, and Pablo Ottonello
Topics: Monetary Policy