This paper investigates a unique policy designed to maintain employment during the privatization of East German firms after the fall of the Iron Curtain. The policy required new owners of the firms to commit to employment targets, with penalties for non-compliance. Using a dynamic model, we highlight three channels through which employment targets impact firms: distorted employment decisions, increased productivity, and higher exit rates. Our empirical analysis, using a novel dataset and instrumental variable approach, confirms these findings. We estimate a 22% points higher annual employment growth rate, a 14% points higher annual productivity growth, and a 3.6% points higher probability of exit for firms with binding employment targets. Our calibrated model further demonstrates that without these targets, aggregate employment would have been 15% lower after 10 years. Additionally, an alternative policy of productivity investment subsidies proved costly and less effective in the short term.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Mar 19, 2025

The Impact of Employment on Partnerships: Evidence from a Refugee Settlement

Yueh-ya Hsu, Reshmaan Hussam, Erin M. Kelley, and Gregory Lane
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Mar 10, 2025

The Rise of Healthcare Jobs

Joshua Gottlieb, Neale Mahoney, Kevin Rinz, and Victoria Udalova
Topics: Employment & Wages, Health care
BFI Working Paper·Mar 10, 2025

The Curious Surge of Productivity in U.S. Restaurants

Austan Goolsbee, Chad Syverson, Rebecca Goldgof, and Joe Tatarka
Topics: COVID-19, Employment & Wages, Industrial Organization