This paper investigates a unique policy designed to maintain employment during the privatization of East German firms after the fall of the Iron Curtain. The policy required new owners of the firms to commit to employment targets, with penalties for non-compliance. Using a dynamic model, we highlight three channels through which employment targets impact firms: distorted employment decisions, increased productivity, and higher exit rates. Our empirical analysis, using a novel dataset and instrumental variable approach, confirms these findings. We estimate a 22% points higher annual employment growth rate, a 14% points higher annual productivity growth, and a 3.6% points higher probability of exit for firms with binding employment targets. Our calibrated model further demonstrates that without these targets, aggregate employment would have been 15% lower after 10 years. Additionally, an alternative policy of productivity investment subsidies proved costly and less effective in the short term.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Apr 29, 2026

Intermediate Input Prices and the Labor Share

Juanma Castro-Vincenzi and Benny Kleinman
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Mar 20, 2026

Physician Competition: Entry and Substitution

Joshua Gottlieb and Sean Nicholson
Topics: Employment & Wages, Health care
BFI Working Paper·Mar 18, 2026

International Comparison of Physician Incomes

Aidan Buehler, Joshua Gottlieb, Jeffrey Hicks, Lisa Laun, Mårten Palme, Maria Polyakova, Victoria Udalova, and Maria Ventura
Topics: Employment & Wages, Health care