This paper investigates a unique policy designed to maintain employment during the privatization of East German firms after the fall of the Iron Curtain. The policy required new owners of the firms to commit to employment targets, with penalties for non-compliance. Using a dynamic model, we highlight three channels through which employment targets impact firms: distorted employment decisions, increased productivity, and higher exit rates. Our empirical analysis, using a novel dataset and instrumental variable approach, confirms these findings. We estimate a 22% points higher annual employment growth rate, a 14% points higher annual productivity growth, and a 3.6% points higher probability of exit for firms with binding employment targets. Our calibrated model further demonstrates that without these targets, aggregate employment would have been 15% lower after 10 years. Additionally, an alternative policy of productivity investment subsidies proved costly and less effective in the short term.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Aug 15, 2024

Disemployment Effects of Unemployment Insurance: A Meta-Analysis

Jonathan Cohen and Peter Ganong
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Jul 29, 2024

Incentives and Habit Formation in Health Screenings: Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study

Damon Jones, David Molitor, and Julian Reif
Topics: Employment & Wages, Health care
BFI Working Paper·Jul 29, 2024

Employee Innovation During Office Work, Work from Home and Hybrid Work

Michael Gibbs, Friederike Mengel, and Christoph Siemroth
Topics: COVID-19, Employment & Wages