This paper investigates a unique policy designed to maintain employment during the privatization of East German firms after the fall of the Iron Curtain. The policy required new owners of the firms to commit to employment targets, with penalties for non-compliance. Using a dynamic model, we highlight three channels through which employment targets impact firms: distorted employment decisions, increased productivity, and higher exit rates. Our empirical analysis, using a novel dataset and instrumental variable approach, confirms these findings. We estimate a 22% points higher annual employment growth rate, a 14% points higher annual productivity growth, and a 3.6% points higher probability of exit for firms with binding employment targets. Our calibrated model further demonstrates that without these targets, aggregate employment would have been 15% lower after 10 years. Additionally, an alternative policy of productivity investment subsidies proved costly and less effective in the short term.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jan 7, 2026

A World Trading System For Whom? Evidence from Global Tariffs

Rodrigo Adão, John Sturm Becko, Arnaud Costinot, and Dave Donaldson
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Jan 5, 2026

The Labor Market Return to Permanent Residency

Kory Kroft, Isaac Norwich, Matthew Notowidigdo, and Stephen Tino
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Oct 7, 2025

Tapping Business and Household Surveys to Sharpen Our View of Work from Home

José María Barrero, Nicholas Bloom, Kathryn Bonney, Cory Breaux, Catherine Buffington, Steven J. Davis, Lucia Foster, Brian McKenzie, Keith Savage, and Cristina Tello-Trillo
Topics: Employment & Wages