Using de-identified bank account data, we show that spending drops sharply at the large and predictable decrease in income arising from the exhaustion of unemployment insurance (UI) benefits. We use the high-frequency response to a predictable income decline as a new test to distinguish between alternative consumption models. The sensitivity of spending to income we document is inconsistent with rational models of liquidity-constrained households, but is consistent with behavioral models with present- biased or myopic households. Depressed spending after exhaustion also implies that the consumption-smoothing gains from extending UI benefits are four times larger than from raising UI benefit levels.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper May 22, 2019

The Decline, Rebound, and Further Rise in SNAP Enrollment: Disentangling Business Cycle Fluctuations and Policy Changes

Peter Ganong, Jeffrey B. Liebman
Topics:  Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper May 22, 2019

Why Has Regional Income Convergence in the U.S. Declined?

Peter Ganong, Daniel Shoag
BFI Working Paper Jan 16, 2018

How Do Changes In Housing Voucher Design Affect Rent and Neighborhood Quality?

Peter Ganong, Robert Collinson
Topics:  Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages, Financial Markets