A health insurer’s Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) is the share of premiums spent on medical claims. As part of the goal of reducing the cost of health care coverage, the Affordable Care Act introduced minimum MLR provisions for all health insurance sold in fully-insured commercial markets as of 2011, thereby explicitly capping insurer profit margins, but not levels. This cap was binding for many insurers, with over $1 billion of rebates paid in the first year of implementation. We model this constraint imposed upon a monopolistic insurer, and derive distortions analogous to those created under cost of service regulation. We test the implications of the model empirically using administrative data from 2005–2013, with insurers persistently above the minimum MLR threshold serving as the control group in a difference-in-difference design. We find that rather than resulting in reduced premiums, claims costs increased nearly one-for-one with distance below the regulatory threshold: 7% in the individual market, and 2% in the group market.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·May 18, 2026

Valuing Disaster Prevention: Desert Locust Monitoring and Control

Joséphine Gantois, Anouch Missirian, Evelina Linnros, Anna Tompsett, Amir Jina, Gordon C. McCord, and Eyal Frank
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·May 12, 2026

Sentiment and Environmental Performance

George M. Constantinides and Maurizio Montone
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·May 11, 2026

Global Policy Spillovers: How Environmental Policies Propagate through Product Attributes

Koichiro Ito, James M. Sallee, and Andrew Smith
Topics: Energy & Environment