We document five effects of providing individuals with crowdsourced spending information about their peers (individuals with similar characteristics) through a FinTech app. First, users who spend more than their peers reduce their spending significantly, whereas users who spend less keep constant or increase their spending. Second, users’ distance from their peers’ spend- ing affects the reaction monotonically in both directions. Third, users’ reaction is asymmetric – spending cuts are three times as large as increases. Fourth, lower-income users react more than others. Fifth, discretionary spending drives the reaction in both directions and especially cash withdrawals, which are commonly used for incidental expenses and anonymous transac- tions. We argue Bayesian updating, peer pressure, or the fact that bad news looms more than (equally-sized) good news cannot alone explain all these facts.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Mar 27, 2018

Historical Antisemitism, Ethnic Specialization, and Financial Development

Francesco D'Acunto, Michael Weber, Marcel Prokopczuk
Topics:  Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper Nov 1, 2016

Monetary Policy and the Stock Market: Time-Series Evidence

Michael Weber, Andreas Neuhierl
Topics:  Financial Markets, Technology & Innovation, Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper Jul 30, 2018

Dissecting Characteristics Nonparametrically

Joachim Freyberger, Andreas Neuhierl, Michael Weber
Topics:  Fiscal Studies, Financial Markets