The U.S. shale boom has profoundly increased crude oil movements by both pipelines–the traditional mode of transportation–and railroads. This paper develops a model of how pipeline investment and railroad use are determined in equilibrium, emphasizing how railroads’ flexibility allows them to compete with pipelines. We show that policies that address crude-by-rail’s environmental externalities by increasing its costs should lead to large increases in pipeline investment and substitution of oil flows from rail to pipe. Similarly, we find that policies enjoining pipeline construction would cause 80-90% of the displaced oil to flow by rail instead.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Oct 29, 2019

Relinquishing Riches: Auctions vs Informal Negotiations in Texas Oil and Gas Leasing

Thomas Covert, Richard L. Sweeney
Topics:  Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper Jan 1, 2016

Will We Ever Stop Using Fossil Fuels?

Thomas Covert, Michael Greenstone, Christopher R. Knittel
Topics:  Energy & Environment, Financial Markets, Monetary Policy, Tax & Budget, Health care
BFI Working Paper Aug 19, 2019

Output and Attribute-Based Carbon Regulation Under Uncertainty

Ryan Kellogg
Topics:  Energy & Environment