Conventional wisdom suggests that energy efficiency (EE) policies are beneficial because they induce investments that pay for themselves and lead to emissions reductions. However, this belief is primarily based on projections from engineering models. This paper reports on the results of an experimental evaluation of the nation’s largest residential EE program conducted on a sample of more than 30,000 households. The findings suggest that the upfront investment costs are about twice the actual energy savings. Further, the model-projected savings are roughly 2.5 times the actual savings. While this might be attributed to the “rebound” effect – when demand for energy end uses increases as a result of greater efficiency – the paper fails to find evidence of significantly higher indoor temperatures at weatherized homes. Even when accounting for the broader societal benefits of energy efficiency investments, the costs still substantially outweigh the benefits; the average rate of return is approximately -9.5% annually.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Jan 1, 2015

Are the Non-Monetary Costs of Energy Efficiency Investments Large? Understanding Low Take-up of a Free Energy Efficiency Program

Michael Greenstone, Meredith Fowlie, Catherine Wolfram
Topics:  Energy & Environment, Healthcare
BFI Working Paper Sep 1, 2014

The Value of Regulatory Discretion: Estimates from Environmental Inspections in India

Nicholas Ryan, Michael Greenstone, Esther Duflo, Rohini Pande
Topics:  Energy & Environment, Healthcare
BFI Working Paper Aug 1, 2015

Toilets Can Work: Short and Medium Run Health Impacts of Addressing Complementarities and Externalities in Water and Sanitation

Michael Greenstone, Esther Duflo, Raymond Guiteras, Thomas Clasen
Topics:  Energy & Environment, Healthcare