Firms often display product information on their front-of-package labels, with some firms going as far as to make deceptive claims. We study the impact of the “Made in USA” claim – a disclosure not legally required on consumer-packaged goods and yet a claim highlighted by many firms, sometimes deceptively, – on consumer demand. Leveraging the FTC’s investigation of four brands that resulted in removal of the claim from product packages, we study the impact such removal had on sales. We find a decline in demand following the removal of the “Made in USA” claim. Second, to ensure complete exogeneous variation, we conduct a field experiment on eBay, where we run over 900 auctions, varying only whether or not a product contains this country-of-origin information. We find consumers are willing to pay 28% more for the product when marketed as “Made in USA.” The experiments alongside observational data allow us to rationalize firms’ incentives in making deceptive country-of-origin claims.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Aug 4, 2026

Two Selection Problems, One Bias Term: Experimental Sign-Up Is Treatment Choice in Disguise

John List
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jun 23, 2026

Misleading Estimates from Nonlinear Models with a Binary Outcome

Brian Curran, Bruce Meyer, and Derek Wu
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jun 15, 2026

Don’t Give Up on Lab Experiments: Why the Field Still Needs the Lab

John List
Topics: Uncategorized