The 1930’s American Dust Bowl created archetypal “Dust Bowl migrants,” refugees from environmental collapse and economic upheaval. I examine this archetype, comparing migration from more-eroded counties and less-eroded counties to distinguish Dust Bowl migrants from other migrants in this era. Migrants from more-eroded counties were more “negatively selected,” in years of education, than other migrants who were “positively selected.” These Dust Bowl migrants struggled economically, especially in California. Despite migrants’ struggles, however, I estimate strikingly modest impacts of the Dust Bowl on average incomes that contrast with its enduring impacts on agricultural land.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Sep 18, 2025

The Impact of Language on Decision-Making: Auction Winners are Less Cursed in a Foreign Language

Fang Fu, Leigh H. Grant, Ali Hortaçsu, Boaz Keysar, Jidong Yang, and Karen J. Ye
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Aug 20, 2025

Partial Language Acquisition: The Impact of Conformity

William A. Brock, Bo Chen, Steven Durlauf, and Shlomo Weber
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Aug 12, 2025

Seemingly Virtuous Complexity in Return Prediction

Stefan Nagel
Topics: Uncategorized