The 1930’s American Dust Bowl created archetypal “Dust Bowl migrants,” refugees from environmental collapse and economic upheaval. I examine this archetype, comparing migration from more-eroded counties and less-eroded counties to distinguish Dust Bowl migrants from other migrants in this era. Migrants from more-eroded counties were more “negatively selected,” in years of education, than other migrants who were “positively selected.” These Dust Bowl migrants struggled economically, especially in California. Despite migrants’ struggles, however, I estimate strikingly modest impacts of the Dust Bowl on average incomes that contrast with its enduring impacts on agricultural land.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jan 13, 2025

Large Language Models: An Applied Econometric Framework

Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Ashesh Rambachan
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jan 6, 2025

Embedded Culture as a Source of Comparative Advantage

Luigi Guiso, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Dec 9, 2024

The Anatomy of the Great Terror: A Quantitative Analysis of the 1937-38 Purges in the Red Army

Alexei Zakharov and Konstantin Sonin
Topics: Uncategorized