The 1930’s American Dust Bowl created archetypal “Dust Bowl migrants,” refugees from environmental collapse and economic upheaval. I examine this archetype, comparing migration from more-eroded counties and less-eroded counties to distinguish Dust Bowl migrants from other migrants in this era. Migrants from more-eroded counties were more “negatively selected,” in years of education, than other migrants who were “positively selected.” These Dust Bowl migrants struggled economically, especially in California. Despite migrants’ struggles, however, I estimate strikingly modest impacts of the Dust Bowl on average incomes that contrast with its enduring impacts on agricultural land.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Feb 23, 2026

Multidimensional Signaling and the Rise of Cultural Politics

Daron Acemoglu, Georgy Egorov, and Konstantin Sonin
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Feb 2, 2026

Diversionary Escalation: Theory and Evidence from Eastern Ukraine

Natalie Ayers, Christopher W. Blair, Joseph J. Ruggiero, Konstantin Sonin, and Austin Wright
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jan 26, 2026

Never Enough: Dynamic Status Incentives in Organizations

Leonardo Bursztyn, Ewan Rawcliffe, and Hans-Joachim Voth
Topics: Uncategorized