We examine subjective risk premia implied by return expectations of individual investors and professionals for aggregate portfolios of stocks, bonds, currencies, and commodity futures. While in-sample predictive regressions with realized excess returns suggest that objective risk premia vary countercyclically with business cycle variables and aggregate asset valuation measures, subjective risk premia extracted from survey data do not comove much with these variables. This lack of cyclicality of subjective risk premia is a pervasive property that holds in expectations of different groups of market participants and in different asset classes. A similar lack of cyclicality appears in out-of-sample forecasts of excess returns, which suggests that investors’ learning of forecasting relationships in real time may explain much of the cyclicality gap. These findings cast doubt on models that explain time-varying objective risk premia inferred from in-sample regressions with countercyclical variation in perceived risk or risk aversion. We further find a link between subjective perceptions of risk and subjective risk premia, which points toward a positive risk-return tradeoff in subjective beliefs.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jan 21, 2026

FinTech and Customer Capital

Bianca He, Lauren Mostrom, and Amir Sufi
Topics: Financial Markets, Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Dec 10, 2025

Measurement Matters: Financial Reporting and Productivity

John M. Barrios, Brian C. Fujiy, Petro Lisowsky, and Michael Minnis
Topics: Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper·Sep 23, 2025

Dynamic Competition for Sleepy Deposits

Mark L. Egan, Ali Hortaçsu, Nathan A. Kaplan, Adi Sunderam, and Vincent Yao
Topics: Financial Markets