We combine a large-scale field experiment with a customized survey to study whether and how consumers use firm disclosure. In a sample of more than 24,000 U.S. households, we first establish several stylized facts: (i) the average consumer has a moderate preference to purchase from ESG-responsible firms; (ii) consumers typically have no preference for more or less profitable firms; (iii) consumers rarely consult ESG reports and virtually never use financial reports to inform their purchase decisions. In our field experiment, we then inform households about real firm-disclosed profitability and ESG activities through seven randomized information treatments. Consumers increase their purchase intent when exogenously presented with firm-disclosed positive signals about environmental, social, and—to a lesser extent—governance activities. Full ESG reports only have an impact on consumers who choose to view them, whereas financial reports and earnings information do not have an effect. After the experiment, consumers increase their actual product purchases, but these effects are small, short-lived, and only materialize for viewed ESG reports and positive social signals. Through a follow-up survey, we provide explanations for why consumers (do not) change their shopping behavior after our information experiment.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Nov 18, 2024

Making Art Modern: How the Impressionists Started a Permanent Revolution

David Galenson
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Oct 23, 2024

Dual Reductions and the First-Order Approach for Informationally Robust Mechanism Design

Benjamin Brooks and Songzi Du
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Oct 1, 2024

Fear and Dreams: Understanding the Non-Institutional Sources of Leader Strategy

Maria Angélica Bautista, Juan Sebastián Galán, James Robinson, Rafael F. Torres, and Ragnar Torvik
Topics: Uncategorized