We study voters’ response to marginal changes to the fine for electoral abstention in Peru. A smaller fine lowers voter turnout, but the effect of an exemption from compulsory voting is five times larger than that of a full fine reduction, suggesting that non-monetary incentives are the most relevant aspect of compulsory voting. We show that informational frictions limit adaptation to large-scale regulatory changes, causing our elasticity estimates to be substantially smaller than previous experimental estimates in the same setting. We find a negligible impact on representation, as 86% of the extra votes caused by a larger fine are blank or invalid.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Aug 9, 2019

The Geography of Dictatorship and Support for Democracy

Maria Angélica Bautista, Felipe González, Luis Martínez, Pablo Muñoz, Mounu Prem