Research / BFI Working PaperAug 06, 2020

How Much Should We Trust Estimates of Firm Effects and Worker Sorting?

Stéphane Bonhomme, Kerstin Holzheu, Thibaut Lamadon, Elena Manresa, Magne Mogstad, Bradley Setzler

Many studies use matched employer-employee data to estimate a statistical model of earnings determination where log-earnings are expressed as the sum of worker effects, firm effects, covariates, and idiosyncratic error terms. Estimates based on this model have produced two influential yet controversial conclusions. First, firm effects typically explain around 20% of the variance of log-earnings, pointing to the importance of firm-specific wage-setting for earnings inequality. Second, the correlation between firm and worker effects is often small and sometimes negative, indicating little if any sorting of high-wage workers to high-paying firms. The objective of this paper is to assess the sensitivity of these conclusions to the biases that arise because of limited mobility of workers across firms. We use employer-employee data from the US and several European countries while taking advantage of both fixed-effects and random-effects methods for bias-correction. We find that limited mobility bias is severe and that bias-correction is important. Once one corrects for limited mobility bias, firm effects dispersion matters less for earnings inequality and worker sorting becomes always positive and typically strong.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Apr 21, 2021

College as a Marriage Market

Lars Kirkebøen, Edwin Leuven, Magne Mogstad
Topics:  Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper Dec 31, 2020

Broadband Internet and the Stock Market Investments of Individual Investors

Hans K. Hvide, Tom G. Meling, Magne Mogstad, Ola L. Vestad
Topics:  Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper Jul 20, 2020

Policy Evaluation with Multiple Instrumental Variables

Magne Mogstad, Alexander Torgovitsky, Christopher R. Walters
Topics:  Uncategorized