Research / BFI Working PaperAug 06, 2020

How Much Should We Trust Estimates of Firm Effects and Worker Sorting?

Stéphane Bonhomme, Kerstin Holzheu, Thibaut Lamadon, Elena Manresa, Magne Mogstad, Bradley Setzler

Many studies use matched employer-employee data to estimate a statistical model of earnings determination where log-earnings are expressed as the sum of worker effects, firm effects, covariates, and idiosyncratic error terms. Estimates based on this model have produced two influential yet controversial conclusions. First, firm effects typically explain around 20% of the variance of log-earnings, pointing to the importance of firm-specific wage-setting for earnings inequality. Second, the correlation between firm and worker effects is often small and sometimes negative, indicating little if any sorting of high-wage workers to high-paying firms. The objective of this paper is to assess the sensitivity of these conclusions to the biases that arise because of limited mobility of workers across firms. We use employer-employee data from the US and several European countries while taking advantage of both fixed-effects and random-effects methods for bias-correction. We find that limited mobility bias is severe and that bias-correction is important. Once one corrects for limited mobility bias, firm effects dispersion matters less for earnings inequality and worker sorting becomes always positive and typically strong.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Feb 21, 2018

Why do wealthy parents have wealthy children?

Andreas Fagereng, Magne Mogstad, Marte Rønning
Topics:  Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper Sep 8, 2020

Reservation Wages and Workers’ Valuation of Job Flexibility: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment

Kuan-Ming Chen, Ning Ding, John List, Magne Mogstad
BFI Working Paper Jun 29, 2020

Trade and Domestic Production Networks

Felix Tintelnot, Ayumu Ken Kikkawa, Magne Mogstad, Emmanuel Dhyne
Topics:  Uncategorized