This paper studies intergenerational mobility—the transmission of family influence. We develop and estimate measures of lifetime resources (income and wealth) motivated by economic theory that account for generational differences in life-cycle trajectories, uncertainty, and credit constraints. These measures of lifetime resources allow us to estimate the transmission of welfare and lifetime resources at different stages of the life cycle. We com- pare these measures with traditional ones such as wage income and disposable income measured over narrow windows of age that are used to proxy lifetime wealth. The performance of proxy measures is poor. Parents’ expected lifetime resources are stronger predictors of many important child outcomes (including children’s own expected lifetime resources and education) than the income measures traditionally used in the literature on social mobility. Changes in patterns of educational attainment across generations explain most of the intergenerational change in life-cycle dynamics. While relative mobility is overstated by the traditional income measures, absolute upward mobility is understated. Recent generations have higher welfare and are better off compared to their parents.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Feb 11, 2025

Income Equality in The Nordic Countries: Myths, Facts, and Lessons

Magne Mogstad, Kjell G. Salvanes, and Gaute Torsvik
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Feb 4, 2025

Local GDP Estimates Around the World

Esteban Rossi-Hansberg and Jialing Zhang
Topics: COVID-19, Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper·Jan 29, 2025

Toward an Understanding of Discrimination When Multiple Channels Exist

Majid Ahmadi, Gwen-Jirō Clochard, Jeff Lachman, and John List
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty