Many jurisdictions levy sizable fines and fees (legal financial obligations, or LFOs) on criminal defendants. Proponents argue LFOs are a “tax on crime” that funds courts and provides deterrence; opponents argue they do neither. We examine the fiscal implications of lowering LFOs. Incentives to default generate a “Laffer” curve with revenue eventually decreasing in LFOs. Using detailed administrative data, however, we find few defendants demonstrably on the right-hand side of the curve. Those who are tend to be poor, Black, and charged with felonies. As a result, decreasing LFOs for the average defendant would come at substantial cost to governments.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·May 29, 2025

Transformative and Subsistence Entrepreneurs: Origins and Impacts on Economic Growth

Ufuk Akcigit, Harun Alp, Jeremy Pearce, and Marta Prato
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper·Apr 10, 2025

Asylum Seekers and the Rise in Homelessness

Bruce Meyer, Angela Wyse, and Douglas Williams
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper·Apr 1, 2025

The Role of Risk and Ambiguity Preferences on Early-Childhood Investment: Evidence from Rural India

Michael Cuna, Lenka Fiala, Min Sok Lee, John List, and Sutanuka Roy
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty