Many jurisdictions levy sizable fines and fees (legal financial obligations, or LFOs) on criminal defendants. Proponents argue LFOs are a “tax on crime” that funds courts and provides deterrence; opponents argue they do neither. We examine the fiscal implications of lowering LFOs. Incentives to default generate a “Laffer” curve with revenue eventually decreasing in LFOs. Using detailed administrative data, however, we find few defendants demonstrably on the right-hand side of the curve. Those who are tend to be poor, Black, and charged with felonies. As a result, decreasing LFOs for the average defendant would come at substantial cost to governments.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Feb 14, 2025

The Social Construction of Race during Reconstruction

Anjali Adukia, Richard Hornbeck, Daniel Keniston, and Benjamin Lualdi
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper·Feb 11, 2025

Income Equality in The Nordic Countries: Myths, Facts, and Lessons

Magne Mogstad, Kjell G. Salvanes, and Gaute Torsvik
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Feb 4, 2025

Local GDP Estimates Around the World

Esteban Rossi-Hansberg and Jialing Zhang
Topics: COVID-19, Economic Mobility & Poverty