We use variation in mortgage modifications to disentangle the impact of reducing long-term obligations with no change in short-term payments (“wealth”), and reducing short-term payments with approximately no change in long-term obligations (“liquidity”). Using regression discontinuity and difference-in-differences research designs with administrative data measuring default and consumption, we find that principal reductions that increase housing wealth without affecting liquidity have no effect, while maturity extensions that increase only liquidity have large effects. Our results suggest that liquidity drives borrower default and consumption decisions, and that distressed debt restructurings can be redesigned with substantial gains to borrowers, lenders, and taxpayers.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Mar 20, 2025

Credit Card Entrepeneurs

Ufuk Akcigit, Raman S. Chhina, Seyit Cilasun, Javier Miranda, and Nicolas Serrano-Velarde
Topics: Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper·Mar 19, 2025

The Impact of Employment on Partnerships: Evidence from a Refugee Settlement

Yueh-ya Hsu, Reshmaan Hussam, Erin M. Kelley, and Gregory Lane
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Mar 10, 2025

The Rise of Healthcare Jobs

Joshua Gottlieb, Neale Mahoney, Kevin Rinz, and Victoria Udalova
Topics: Employment & Wages, Health care