We use variation in mortgage modifications to disentangle the impact of reducing long-term obligations with no change in short-term payments (“wealth”), and reducing short-term payments with approximately no change in long-term obligations (“liquidity”). Using regression discontinuity and difference-in-differences research designs with administrative data measuring default and consumption, we find that principal reductions that increase housing wealth without affecting liquidity have no effect, while maturity extensions that increase only liquidity have large effects. Our results suggest that liquidity drives borrower default and consumption decisions, and that distressed debt restructurings can be redesigned with substantial gains to borrowers, lenders, and taxpayers.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Aug 31, 2026

Democratizing Private Markets: Equilibrium Predictions

Lubos Pastor, Robert F. Stambaugh, and Lucian A. Taylor
Topics: Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper·Aug 31, 2026

The Anatomy and Evolution of Survey Error

Bruce Meyer, Nikolas Mittag, Derek Wu, Anthony Tatarka, and Patrick Langetieg
Topics: Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper·Aug 24, 2026

The Effects of SNAP Sugary Drink Restrictions on Consumption and Welfare

Hunt Allcott, Amy Finkelstein, Anna Grummon, and Matthew Notowidigdo
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Health care