We use variation in mortgage modifications to disentangle the impact of reducing long-term obligations with no change in short-term payments (“wealth”), and reducing short-term payments with approximately no change in long-term obligations (“liquidity”). Using regression discontinuity and difference-in-differences research designs with administrative data measuring default and consumption, we find that principal reductions that increase housing wealth without affecting liquidity have no effect, while maturity extensions that increase only liquidity have large effects. Our results suggest that liquidity drives borrower default and consumption decisions, and that distressed debt restructurings can be redesigned with substantial gains to borrowers, lenders, and taxpayers.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jun 30, 2025

Building Costs and House Prices

Brian Potter and Chad Syverson
Topics: Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper·Jun 30, 2025

Borrowing Constraints, Markups, and Misallocation

Huiyu Li, Chen Lian, Yueran Ma, and Emily Martell
Topics: Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper·Jun 23, 2025

Macro Shocks and Firm-Level Response Heterogeneity

Steven J. Davis, Stephen Hansen, and Cristhian Seminario-Amez
Topics: Financial Markets