This paper shows the endogeneity of amenities plays a crucial role in determining the welfare distribution of a city’s residents. We quantify this mechanism by building a dynamic model of residential choice with heterogeneous households, where consumption amenities are the equilibrium outcome of a market for non-tradables. We estimate our model using Dutch microdata and leveraging variation in Amsterdam’s spatial distribution of tourists as a demand shifter, finding significant heterogeneity in residents’ preferences over amenities and in the supply responses of amenities to changes in demand composition. This two-way heterogeneity dictates the degree of horizontal differentiation across neighborhoods, residential sorting, and inequality. Finally, we show the distributional effects of mass tourism depend on this heterogeneity: following rent increases due to growing tourist demand for housing, younger residents—whose amenity preferences are closest to tourists—are compensated by amenities tilting in their favor, while the losses of older residents are amplified.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 21, 2025

Who Pays for Tariffs Along the Supply Chain? Evidence from European Wine Tariffs

Aaron B. Flaaen, Ali Hortaçsu, Felix Tintelnot, Nicolás Urdaneta, and Daniel Xu
Topics: Fiscal Studies, Industrial Organization
BFI Working Paper·Sep 23, 2025

Why Is Manufacturing Productivity Growth So Low?

Enghin Atalay, Ali Hortaçsu, Nicole Kimmel, and Chad Syverson
Topics: Industrial Organization
BFI Working Paper·Sep 18, 2025

Missing Markets for Innovation: Evidence from New Uses of Existing Drugs

Eric Budish, Maya M. Durvasula, Benjamin N. Roin, and Heidi L. Williams
Topics: Industrial Organization