This paper shows the endogeneity of amenities plays a crucial role in determining the welfare distribution of a city’s residents. We quantify this mechanism by building a dynamic model of residential choice with heterogeneous households, where consumption amenities are the equilibrium outcome of a market for non-tradables. We estimate our model using Dutch microdata and leveraging variation in Amsterdam’s spatial distribution of tourists as a demand shifter, finding significant heterogeneity in residents’ preferences over amenities and in the supply responses of amenities to changes in demand composition. This two-way heterogeneity dictates the degree of horizontal differentiation across neighborhoods, residential sorting, and inequality. Finally, we show the distributional effects of mass tourism depend on this heterogeneity: following rent increases due to growing tourist demand for housing, younger residents—whose amenity preferences are closest to tourists—are compensated by amenities tilting in their favor, while the losses of older residents are amplified.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Dec 2, 2024

Painful Bargaining: Evidence from Anesthesia Rollups

Aslihan Asil, Paulo Ramos, Amanda Starc, and Thomas Wollmann
Topics: Health care, Industrial Organization
BFI Working Paper·Aug 20, 2024

Have CEOs Changed?

Yann Decressin, Steven Neil Kaplan, and Morten Sorensen
Topics: Industrial Organization
BFI Working Paper·Jun 10, 2024

Spatial Competition, Strategic Entry Responses, and the North Dakota Railroad War of 1905

Chad Syverson
Topics: Industrial Organization