This paper studies the causal impacts of public universities on the outcomes of their marginally admitted students. I use administrative admission records spanning all 35 public universities in Texas, which collectively enroll 10 percent of American public university students, to systematically identify and employ decentralized cutoffs in SAT/ACT scores that generate discontinuities in admission and enrollment. The typical marginally admitted student completes an additional year of education in the four-year sector, is 12 percentage points more likely to earn a bachelor’s degree, and eventually earns 5-10 percent more than their marginally rejected but otherwise identical counterpart. Marginally admitted students pay no additional tuition costs thanks to offsetting grant aid; cost-benefit calculations show internal rates of return of 19-23 percent for the marginal students themselves, 10-12 percent for society (which must pay for the additional education), and 3-4 percent for the government budget. Finally, I develop a method to disentangle separate effects for students on the extensive margin of the four-year sector versus those who would fall back to another four-year school if rejected. Substantially larger extensive margin effects drive the results.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jul 29, 2024

The Graduation Part II: Graduate School Graduation Rates

Jeffrey T. Denning and Lesley Turner
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training
BFI Working Paper·Feb 19, 2024

English Language Requirement and Educational Inequality: Evidence from 16 Million College Applicants in China

Hongbin Li, Lingsheng Meng, Kai Mu, and Shaoda Wang
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training
BFI Working Paper·Feb 5, 2024

Experimental Estimates of College Coaching on Postsecondary Re-enrollment

Lesley Turner and Oded Gurantz
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training