The 1996 PRWORA reform introduced time limits on the receipt of welfare in the United States. We use variation by state and across demographic groups to provide reduced form evidence showing that such limits led to a fall in welfare claims (partly due to “banking” benefits for future use), a rise in employment, and a decline in divorce rates. We then specify and estimate a life-cycle model of marriage, labor supply and divorce under limited commitment to better understand the mechanisms behind these behavioral responses, carry out counterfactual analysis with longer run impacts and evaluate the welfare effects of the program. Based on the model, which reproduces the reduced form estimates, we show that among low educated women, instead of relying on TANF, single mothers work more, more mothers remain married, some move to relying only on food stamps and, in ex-ante welfare terms, women are worse off.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Feb 18, 2026

Trading Goods for Lives: NAFTA’s Mortality Impacts and Implications

Amy Finkelstein, Matthew Notowidigdo, and Steven Shi
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Feb 16, 2026

Income Shocks and the Intergenerational Transmission of Executive Function

Ariel Kalil and Mauricio Koechlin
Topics: Early Childhood Education, Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper·Feb 10, 2026

Class Mobility in the Era of Rising Inequality: A Synthetic Dynasty Analysis

Geoffrey Wodtke, Weiqi Wang, Kristina Butaeva, and Steven Durlauf
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty