The 1996 PRWORA reform introduced time limits on the receipt of welfare in the United States. We use variation by state and across demographic groups to provide reduced form evidence showing that such limits led to a fall in welfare claims (partly due to “banking” benefits for future use), a rise in employment, and a decline in divorce rates. We then specify and estimate a life-cycle model of marriage, labor supply and divorce under limited commitment to better understand the mechanisms behind these behavioral responses, carry out counterfactual analysis with longer run impacts and evaluate the welfare effects of the program. Based on the model, which reproduces the reduced form estimates, we show that among low educated women, instead of relying on TANF, single mothers work more, more mothers remain married, some move to relying only on food stamps and, in ex-ante welfare terms, women are worse off.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jun 30, 2026

The Effect of Reminders for Self-Set Goals on Productivity

Martin Abel, Tomoko Harigaya, Michael Kremer, and Jessica Zhu
Topics: Development Economics, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Jun 10, 2026

The Enjoyment Paradox: College-Educated Mothers Invest More in Their Children’s Learning and Enjoy It Less

Ariel Kalil, Haoxuan Liu, and Ritika Sethi
Topics: Early Childhood Education, Employment & Wages, Higher Education & Workforce Training
BFI Working Paper·Jun 8, 2026

Intergenerational Mobility in Late Qing Dynasty: Evidence from Northeast China

Kristina Butaeva, Steven Durlauf, and Alexander Shapoval
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty