We use Belgian data on domestic firm-to-firm transactions and ask how the measurement of the share of imports in final consumption is affected when one uses data recorded at higher levels of aggregation. We find that aggregating detailed firm-to-firm transaction data to the firm level and imposing homogeneity assumptions in the composition of firms’ input and output do not substantially affect the measurement of the share of imports in final consumption. However, using the national IO tables alone may understate the share of imports in final consumption and, thereby, the gains from trade.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Mar 10, 2025

The Curious Surge of Productivity in U.S. Restaurants

Austan Goolsbee, Chad Syverson, Rebecca Goldgof, and Joe Tatarka
Topics: COVID-19, Employment & Wages, Industrial Organization
BFI Working Paper·Feb 17, 2025

A Comprehensive GIS Database for China’s Surface Transport Network with Implications for Transport and Socioeconomics Research

Steven J. Davis, Meijun Qian, and Wen Zeng
Topics: Industrial Organization
BFI Working Paper·Jan 29, 2025

Have We Got News For You: Firm-Level Evidence on the Optimal Choice of Expected Capacity Utilization

Niklas Amberg, Richard Friberg, and Chad Syverson
Topics: Industrial Organization