We introduce a framework to evaluate the welfare effects of residential energy efficiency programs and estimate key parameters using a 100,000-household field experiment. Results generally contradict conventional wisdom: there is no evidence of informational or behavioral market failures, efficiency investments entail large non-monetary costs and benefits, and realized energy savings are just 58% of engineering predictions. The programs we study reduce social welfare by $0.18 per subsidy dollar, because investment subsidies are poorly targeted to externality damages and marginal program participants are unlikely to make externality-reducing investments. Such self-selection may undermine socially desirable program expansion in this and other domains.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Apr 15, 2025

Can Pollution Markets Work in Developing Countries? Experimental Evidence from India

Michael Greenstone, Rohini Pande, Nicholas Ryan, and Anant Sudarshan
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Mar 10, 2025

The Value of Clean Water: Experimental Evidence from Rural India

Fiona Burlig, Amir Jina, and Anant Sudarshan
Topics: Development Economics, Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Jan 28, 2025

Drive Down the Cost: Learning by Doing and Government Policies in the Global EV Battery Industry

Panle Jia Barwick, Hyuk-soo Kwon, Shanjun Li Nahim, and Bin Zahur
Topics: Energy & Environment, Technology & Innovation