Research / BFI Working PaperJun 10, 2023

On the Use of Outcome Tests for Detecting Bias in Decision Making

Ivan A. Canay, Magne Mogstad, Jack Mountjoy

The decisions of judges, lenders, journal editors, and other gatekeepers often lead to significant disparities across affected groups. An important question is whether, and to what extent, these group-level disparities are driven by relevant differences in underlying individual characteristics, or by biased decision makers. Becker (1957, 1993) proposed an outcome test of bias based on differences in post-decision outcomes across groups, inspiring a large and growing empirical literature. The goal of our paper is to offer a methodological blueprint for empirical work that seeks to use outcome tests to detect bias. We show that models of decision making underpinning outcome tests can be usefully recast as Roy models, since heterogeneous potential outcomes enter directly into the decision maker’s choice equation. Different members of the Roy model family, however, are distinguished by the tightness of the link between potential outcomes and decisions. We show that these distinctions have important implications for defining bias, deriving logically valid outcome tests of such bias, and identifying the marginal outcomes that the test requires.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Aug 23, 2022

Broadband Internet and the Stock Market Investments of Individual Investors

Hans K. Hvide, Tom G. Meling, Magne Mogstad, Ola L. Vestad
Topics:  Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper Dec 17, 2020

Do Employees Benefit from Worker Representation on Corporate Boards?

Christine Blandhol, Magne Mogstad, Peter Nilsson, Ola L.Vestad
Topics:  Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper Dec 31, 2020

Broadband Internet and the Stock Market Investments of Individual Investors

Hans K. Hvide, Tom G. Meling, Magne Mogstad, Ola L. Vestad
Topics:  Financial Markets