Output-based carbon regulations—such as fuel economy standards and the rate- based standards in the Clean Power Plan—create well-known incentives to inefficiently increase output. Similar distortions are created by attribute-based regulations. This paper demonstrates that, despite these distortions, output and attribute-based standards can always yield greater expected welfare than “flat” emission standards given uncertainty in demand for output (or attributes), assuming locally constant marginal damages. For fuel economy standards, the welfare-maximizing amount of attribute or mileage-basing is likely small relative to current policy. For the electricity sector, however, an intensity standard may yield greater expected welfare than a flat standard.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Mar 10, 2025

The Value of Clean Water: Experimental Evidence from Rural India

Fiona Burlig, Amir Jina, and Anant Sudarshan
Topics: Development Economics, Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Jan 28, 2025

Drive Down the Cost: Learning by Doing and Government Policies in the Global EV Battery Industry

Panle Jia Barwick, Hyuk-soo Kwon, Shanjun Li Nahim, and Bin Zahur
Topics: Energy & Environment, Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Jan 13, 2025

The Cost of Species Protection: The Land Market Impacts of the Endangered Species Act

Eyal Frank, Maximilian Auffhammer, David W. McLaughlin, and Elisheba Spiller
Topics: Energy & Environment