We study the design of provider incentives in the post-acute care setting in a high-stakes but under-studied segment of the healthcare system. We focus on longterm care hospitals (LTCHs) and the large (approximately $13,000) jump in Medicare payments they receive when a patient’s stay reaches a threshold number of days. The descriptive evidence indicates that discharges increase substantially after the threshold, and that the marginal patient discharged after the threshold is in relatively better health. Despite the large financial incentives and behavioral response in a high mortality population, we are unable to detect any compelling evidence of an impact on patient mortality. To assess provider behavior under counterfactual payment schedules, we estimate a simple dynamic discrete choice model of LTCH discharge decisions. When we conservatively limit ourselves to alternative contracts that hold the LTCH harmless, we find that an alternative contract can generate Medicare savings of about $2,100 per admission, or about 5% of total payments. More aggressive payment reforms can generate substantially greater savings, but the accompanying reduction in LTCH profits has potential out-of-sample consequences. Our results highlight how improved financial incentives may be able to reduce healthcare spending, without negative consequences for industry profits or patient health.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jan 7, 2026

The Impacts of Parole Supervision

Luke Brinkman, Andrew Jordan, and Derek Neal
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper·Jan 7, 2026

A World Trading System For Whom? Evidence from Global Tariffs

Rodrigo Adão, John Sturm Becko, Arnaud Costinot, and Dave Donaldson
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Jan 5, 2026

The Labor Market Return to Permanent Residency

Kory Kroft, Isaac Norwich, Matthew Notowidigdo, and Stephen Tino
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages