Do states experience more peace under female leadership? We examine this question in the context of Europe over the 15th-20th centuries. We instrument queenly rule using gender of the first born and whether the previous monarchs had a sister. We find that polities led by queens participated in war more than polities led by kings. Moreover, aggressive participation varied by marital status. Single queens were attacked more than single kings. However, married queens attacked more than married kings. These results suggest that asymmetries in the division of labor positioned married queens to be able to pursue more aggressive war policies.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Sep 4, 2024

Neoclassical Growth Transition Dynamics with One-Sided Commitment

Dirk Krueger, Fulin Li, and Harald Uhlig
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jul 22, 2024

Seeing like a Citizen: Experimental Evidence on How Empowerment Affects Engagement with the State

Soeren J. Henn, Laura Paler, Wilson Prichard, Cyrus Samii, and Raul Sanchez de la Sierra
Topics: Uncategorized