Motivated by the public debate regarding corporate responsibility, we construct a memory-based model of decision-making to illustrate how corporate and political communication can impact policy preferences. We test the predictions of our model in a new large-scale survey of U.S. citizens on their support for economic policies such as corporate bailouts. We first establish that the public demands corporations to behave better within society, a sentiment we label “big business discontent.” Then, using random variation in the order of survey sections and in the exposure to animated videos, we confirm the key predictions of our model. First, messages that prime respondents to think about policy through the lens of corporate responsibility make people more averse to bailouts, while reframing the issue in terms of economic trade-offs has opposite effects. Second, attempts to paint a positive public image of big business can actually backfire, as they focus attention on an aspect on which the public has well-established negative views.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Feb 20, 2025

Non est Disputandum de Generalizability? A Glimpse into The External Validity Trial

John List
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Feb 18, 2025

How Costly Are Business Cycle Volatility and Inflation? A Vox Populi Approach

Dimitris Georgarakos, Kwang Hwan Kim, Olivier Coibion, Myungkyu Shim, Myunghwan Andrew Lee, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, Geoff Kenny, Seowoo Han, and Michael Weber
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Feb 14, 2025

Decisions Under Risk are Decisions Under Complexity: Comment

Daniel Banki, Uri Simonsohn, Robert Walatka, and George Wu
Topics: Uncategorized