The North Dakota Railroad War of 1905, which pitted a potential entrant (the Soo Line) against an established monopolist incumbent (the Great Northern Railway), offers a lucid empirical example of strategic behavior, and in particular the potential for entry deterrence through product proliferation. I use detailed geographic data and historical records to examine the profitability of both the incumbent’s and entrant’s potential and chosen strategies. I find that the incumbent could have likely profitably deterred entry. It did not, however, waiting instead to respond only once the entrant began building. This simultaneous entry arguably led to over expansion in the market. I investigate whether the chosen strategies may have ultimately ended up being both unprofitable for the firms involved as well as, potentially, socially wasteful.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Mar 10, 2025

The Curious Surge of Productivity in U.S. Restaurants

Austan Goolsbee, Chad Syverson, Rebecca Goldgof, and Joe Tatarka
Topics: COVID-19, Employment & Wages, Industrial Organization
BFI Working Paper·Feb 17, 2025

A Comprehensive GIS Database for China’s Surface Transport Network with Implications for Transport and Socioeconomics Research

Steven J. Davis, Meijun Qian, and Wen Zeng
Topics: Industrial Organization
BFI Working Paper·Jan 29, 2025

Have We Got News For You: Firm-Level Evidence on the Optimal Choice of Expected Capacity Utilization

Niklas Amberg, Richard Friberg, and Chad Syverson
Topics: Industrial Organization