The North Dakota Railroad War of 1905, which pitted a potential entrant (the Soo Line) against an established monopolist incumbent (the Great Northern Railway), offers a lucid empirical example of strategic behavior, and in particular the potential for entry deterrence through product proliferation. I use detailed geographic data and historical records to examine the profitability of both the incumbent’s and entrant’s potential and chosen strategies. I find that the incumbent could have likely profitably deterred entry. It did not, however, waiting instead to respond only once the entrant began building. This simultaneous entry arguably led to over expansion in the market. I investigate whether the chosen strategies may have ultimately ended up being both unprofitable for the firms involved as well as, potentially, socially wasteful.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·May 18, 2026

Proposed Mergers Where Efficiencies Are Needed Most Might Be the Least Likely to Deliver Them

Robert D. Metcalfe, Alexandre B. Sollaci, and Chad Syverson
Topics: Industrial Organization
BFI Working Paper·Mar 31, 2026

Salience and (Non-)Buyer’s Remorse: Optimal Nonlinear Pricing with Cognitively Constrained Consumers

Aaron L. Bodoh-Creed, Brent R. Hickman, John List, Ian Muir, and Gregory K. Sun
Topics: Industrial Organization
BFI Working Paper·Jan 6, 2026

Entry and Exit in Treasury Auctions

Jason Allen, Ali Hortaçsu, Eric Richert, and Milena Wittwer
Topics: Industrial Organization