We show that the largest increase in unemployment benefits in U.S. history had large spending impacts and small job-finding impacts. This finding has three implications. First, increased benefits were important for explaining aggregate spending dynamics—but not employment dynamics—during the pandemic. Second, benefit expansions allow us to study the MPC of normally low liquidity households in a high-liquidity state. These households still have high MPCs. This suggests a role for permanent behavioral characteristics, rather than just current liquidity, in driving spending behavior. Third, the mechanisms driving our results imply that temporary benefit supplements are a promising countercyclical tool.

Research·BFI Working Paper·Apr 9, 2024

The Glass Web: Kinship Networks, Female Executives, and Firm Outcomes in the Middle East

Alessandra González and Nicolas Wesseler
Topics: Employment & Wages
Research·BFI Working Paper·Apr 8, 2024

A Discrimination Report Card

Patrick Kline, Evan K. Rose and Christopher R. Walters
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
Research·BFI Working Paper·Apr 3, 2024

Application Flows

Steven J. Davis and Brenda Samaniego de la Parra
Topics: Employment & Wages