We show that the largest increase in unemployment benefits in U.S. history had large spending impacts and small job-finding impacts. This finding has three implications. First, increased benefits were important for explaining aggregate spending dynamics—but not employment dynamics—during the pandemic. Second, benefit expansions allow us to study the MPC of normally low liquidity households in a high-liquidity state. These households still have high MPCs. This suggests a role for permanent behavioral characteristics, rather than just current liquidity, in driving spending behavior. Third, the mechanisms driving our results imply that temporary benefit supplements are a promising countercyclical tool.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 7, 2025

Tapping Business and Household Surveys to Sharpen Our View of Work from Home

José María Barrero, Nicholas Bloom, Kathryn Bonney, Cory Breaux, Catherine Buffington, Steven J. Davis, Lucia Foster, Brian McKenzie, Keith Savage, and Cristina Tello-Trillo
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Sep 16, 2025

Making the Invisible Hand Visible: Managers and the Allocation of Workers to Jobs

Virginia Minni
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Sep 8, 2025

Earnings Instability

Peter Ganong, Pascal Noel, Christina Patterson, Joseph S. Vavra, and Alexander Weinberg
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages