We show that the largest increase in unemployment benefits in U.S. history had large spending impacts and small job-finding impacts. This finding has three implications. First, increased benefits were important for explaining aggregate spending dynamics—but not employment dynamics—during the pandemic. Second, benefit expansions allow us to study the MPC of normally low liquidity households in a high-liquidity state. These households still have high MPCs. This suggests a role for permanent behavioral characteristics, rather than just current liquidity, in driving spending behavior. Third, the mechanisms driving our results imply that temporary benefit supplements are a promising countercyclical tool.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jan 7, 2026

A World Trading System For Whom? Evidence from Global Tariffs

Rodrigo Adão, John Sturm Becko, Arnaud Costinot, and Dave Donaldson
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Jan 5, 2026

The Labor Market Return to Permanent Residency

Kory Kroft, Isaac Norwich, Matthew Notowidigdo, and Stephen Tino
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Oct 7, 2025

Tapping Business and Household Surveys to Sharpen Our View of Work from Home

José María Barrero, Nicholas Bloom, Kathryn Bonney, Cory Breaux, Catherine Buffington, Steven J. Davis, Lucia Foster, Brian McKenzie, Keith Savage, and Cristina Tello-Trillo
Topics: Employment & Wages