We show that the largest increase in unemployment benefits in U.S. history had large spending impacts and small job-finding impacts. This finding has three implications. First, increased benefits were important for explaining aggregate spending dynamics—but not employment dynamics—during the pandemic. Second, benefit expansions allow us to study the MPC of normally low liquidity households in a high-liquidity state. These households still have high MPCs. This suggests a role for permanent behavioral characteristics, rather than just current liquidity, in driving spending behavior. Third, the mechanisms driving our results imply that temporary benefit supplements are a promising countercyclical tool.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 6, 2026

Consumption, Savings, and Earnings Responses to Financial Windfalls

Rajashri Chakrabarti, Philippe d'Astous, Kory Kroft, Sheisha Kulkarni, Vyacheslav Mikhed, Matthew Notowidigdo, Sahil Raina, and Barry Scholnick
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Oct 6, 2026

Capital-Skill Complementarity Beyond Firm Boundaries

Gert Bijnens, Anders Humlum, and Stijn Vanormelingen
Topics: Employment & Wages, Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Sep 28, 2026

Crime in Covid Times

Jens Ludwig
Topics: COVID-19