Making inferences about aggregate business cycles from regional variation alone is difficult because of economic channels and shocks that differ between regional and aggregate economies. However, we argue that regional business cycles contain valuable information that can help discipline models of aggregate fluctuations. We begin by documenting a strong relationship across US states between local employment and wage growth during the Great Recession. This relationship is much weaker in US aggregates. Then, we present a methodology that combines such regional and aggregate data in order to estimate a medium-scale New Keynesian DSGE model. We find that aggregate demand shocks were important drivers of aggregate employment during the Great Recession, but the wage stickiness necessary for them to account for the slow employment recovery and the modest fall in aggregate wages is inconsistent with the flexibility of wages we observe across US states. Finally, we show that our methodology yields different conclusions about the causes of aggregate employment and wage dynamics between 2007 and 2014 than either estimating our model with aggregate data alone or performing back-of-the-envelope calculations that directly extrapolate from well-identified regional elasticities.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Apr 2, 2018

The Transformation of Manufacturing and the Decline in U.S. Employment

Kerwin Kofi Charles, Erik Hurst, Mariel Schwartz
Topics:  Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages, K-12 Education, Industrial Organization, Fiscal Studies, Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper Jun 18, 2019

The Allocation of Talent and U.S. Economic Growth

Chang-Tai Hsieh, Erik Hurst, Charles I. Jones, Peter J. Klenow
Topics:  Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper Mar 8, 2019

Aggregate Nominal Wage Adjustments: New Evidence from Administrative Payroll Data

John Grigsby, Erik Hurst, Ahu Yildirmaz