Research / BFI Working PaperApr 22, 2021

The Backward Art of Slowing the Spread? Congregation Efficiencies during COVID-19

Were workers more likely to be infected by COVID-19 in their workplace, or outside it? While both economic models of the pandemic and public health policy recommendations often presume that the workplace is less safe, this paper seeks an answer both in micro data and economic theory. The available data from schools, hospitals, nursing homes, food processing plants, hair stylists, and airlines show employers adopting mitigation protocols in the spring of 2020. Coincident with the adoption, infection rates in workplaces typically dropped from well above household rates to well below. When this occurs, the sign of the disease externality from participating in large organizations changes from negative to positive, even while individuals continue to have an incentive to avoid large organizations due to the prevention costs they impose on members. Rational cooperative prevention sometimes results in infectious-disease patterns that are opposite of predictions from classical epidemiology.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Apr 16, 2020

Economic Activity and the Value of Medical Innovation during a Pandemic

Casey Mulligan
Topics:  COVID-19
BFI Working Paper Mar 15, 2022

Personal Increasing Returns: Analytics and Applications

Casey Mulligan
Topics:  Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper Sep 17, 2017

Adjusting Measures of Economic Output for Health: Is the Business Cycle Countercyclical?

Tomas Philipson, Casey Mulligan, Mark Egan
Topics:  Health care