Were workers more likely to be infected by COVID-19 in their workplace, or outside it? While both economic models of the pandemic and public health policy recommendations often presume that the workplace is less safe, this paper seeks an answer both in micro data and economic theory. The available data from schools, hospitals, nursing homes, food processing plants, hair stylists, and airlines show employers adopting mitigation protocols in the spring of 2020. Coincident with the adoption, infection rates in workplaces typically dropped from well above household rates to well below. When this occurs, the sign of the disease externality from participating in large organizations changes from negative to positive, even while individuals continue to have an incentive to avoid large organizations due to the prevention costs they impose on members. Rational cooperative prevention sometimes results in infectious-disease patterns that are opposite of predictions from classical epidemiology.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Mar 10, 2026

Work from Home and Fertility

Cevat Giray Aksoy, Jose Maria Barrero, Nicholas Bloom, Katelyn Cranney, Steven J. Davis, Mathias Dolls, and Pablo Zarate
Topics: COVID-19, Health care, Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Sep 18, 2025

The Five Shanghai Themes

Harald Uhlig
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Energy & Environment, Financial Markets, Health care
BFI Working Paper·Aug 13, 2025

Post-Roe Planning: The Effect of Dobbs v. Jackson on Contraceptive and Sterilization Choices

Yana Gallen and Daisy Lu
Topics: Health care