Were workers more likely to be infected by COVID-19 in their workplace, or outside it? While both economic models of the pandemic and public health policy recommendations often presume that the workplace is less safe, this paper seeks an answer both in micro data and economic theory. The available data from schools, hospitals, nursing homes, food processing plants, hair stylists, and airlines show employers adopting mitigation protocols in the spring of 2020. Coincident with the adoption, infection rates in workplaces typically dropped from well above household rates to well below. When this occurs, the sign of the disease externality from participating in large organizations changes from negative to positive, even while individuals continue to have an incentive to avoid large organizations due to the prevention costs they impose on members. Rational cooperative prevention sometimes results in infectious-disease patterns that are opposite of predictions from classical epidemiology.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·May 13, 2025

Saved by Medicaid: New Evidence on Health Insurance and Mortality from the Universe of Low-Income Adults

Angela Wyse and Bruce Meyer
Topics: Health care, Tax & Budget
BFI Working Paper·Apr 28, 2025

Screening Through Soft Spending Limits: Evidence from the Medicare Therapy Cap

Ashvin Gandhi and Maggie Shi
Topics: Health care
BFI Working Paper·Apr 23, 2025

Evaluating Recent Crackdowns on Disability Benefits: Effects on Income and Health Care Use in Australia

Manasi Deshpande, Greg Kaplan, and Tobias Leigh-Wood
Topics: Employment & Wages, Health care