What model features and calibration strategies yield a large average marginal propensity to consume (MPC) in heterogeneous agent models? Through a systematic investigation of models with different preferences, dimensions of ex-ante heterogeneity, income processes and asset structure, we show that the most important factor is the share and type of hand-to-mouth households. One-asset models either feature a trade-off between a high average MPC and a realistic level of aggregate wealth, or generate an excessively polarized wealth distribution that vastly understates the wealth held by households in the middle of the distribution. Two-asset models that include both liquid and illiquid assets can resolve this tension with a large enough gap between liquid and illiquid returns. We discuss how such return differential can be justified from the perspective of theory and data.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Feb 16, 2026

Income Shocks and the Intergenerational Transmission of Executive Function

Ariel Kalil and Mauricio Koechlin
Topics: Early Childhood Education, Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper·Feb 10, 2026

Class Mobility in the Era of Rising Inequality: A Synthetic Dynasty Analysis

Geoffrey Wodtke, Weiqi Wang, Kristina Butaeva, and Steven Durlauf
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper·Feb 2, 2026

The Macroeconomic Effects of Neighborhood Policies: a Dynamic Analysis

Alessandra Fogli, Veronica Guerrieri, Mark Ponder, and Marta Prato
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty