What model features and calibration strategies yield a large average marginal propensity to consume (MPC) in heterogeneous agent models? Through a systematic investigation of models with different preferences, dimensions of ex-ante heterogeneity, income processes and asset structure, we show that the most important factor is the share and type of hand-to-mouth households. One-asset models either feature a trade-off between a high average MPC and a realistic level of aggregate wealth, or generate an excessively polarized wealth distribution that vastly understates the wealth held by households in the middle of the distribution. Two-asset models that include both liquid and illiquid assets can resolve this tension with a large enough gap between liquid and illiquid returns. We discuss how such return differential can be justified from the perspective of theory and data.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Apr 10, 2025

Asylum Seekers and the Rise in Homelessness

Bruce Meyer, Angela Wyse, and Douglas Williams
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper·Apr 1, 2025

The Role of Risk and Ambiguity Preferences on Early-Childhood Investment: Evidence from Rural India

Michael Cuna, Lenka Fiala, Min Sok Lee, John List, and Sutanuka Roy
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper·Feb 14, 2025

The Social Construction of Race during Reconstruction

Anjali Adukia, Richard Hornbeck, Daniel Keniston, and Benjamin Lualdi
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty