A number of psychologists have concluded that creativity is primarily the domain of the young. Recent research has shown that this is wrong. Conceptual innovators make sudden radical innovative leaps, early in their careers. But experimental innovators work incrementally to develop new methods based on extended observation, and their innovations emerge late in their careers. The psychologists who contended that creativity diminishes with age failed to perceive that virtually every intellectual activity has had important older experimental innovators as well as their young conceptual rivals. Their error poses a barrier to understanding creativity, and makes a damaging contribution to ageism. This paper briefly examines the achievements of a number of great experimental innovators, including Charles Darwin, Charles Dickens, Paul Cézanne, and Elizabeth Bishop, and uses their work as the basis for an understanding of the specific mechanisms that connect age with experimental creativity.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jun 17, 2025

Using AI to Generate Option C Scaling Ideas: A Case Study in Early Education

Faith Fatchen, John List, and Francesca Pagnotta
Topics: Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Jun 5, 2025

Stablecoin Runs and the Centralization of Arbitrage

Yiming Ma, Yao Zeng, and Anthony Lee Zhang
Topics: Fiscal Studies, Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Apr 22, 2025

Option Value Neglect: Evidence from Centralized College Admission

Ao Wang, Shaoda Wang, and Xiaoyang Ye
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training