A number of psychologists have concluded that creativity is primarily the domain of the young. Recent research has shown that this is wrong. Conceptual innovators make sudden radical innovative leaps, early in their careers. But experimental innovators work incrementally to develop new methods based on extended observation, and their innovations emerge late in their careers. The psychologists who contended that creativity diminishes with age failed to perceive that virtually every intellectual activity has had important older experimental innovators as well as their young conceptual rivals. Their error poses a barrier to understanding creativity, and makes a damaging contribution to ageism. This paper briefly examines the achievements of a number of great experimental innovators, including Charles Darwin, Charles Dickens, Paul Cézanne, and Elizabeth Bishop, and uses their work as the basis for an understanding of the specific mechanisms that connect age with experimental creativity.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jul 15, 2026

Assessing the Benefits of Optimized Agentic AI Systems for Asset Pricing

Ralph Koijen and Bradford Levy
Topics: Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Jun 23, 2026

Can Online Activity Be Regulated? Evidence from Adult Websites

Matthew Brown, Emily J. Davis, and Devin Pope
Topics: Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Jun 23, 2026

An Informational Rationale for Viewpoint Neutrality in Education

Georgy Egorov and Konstantin Sonin
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training