Policymakers are increasingly turning to insights gained from the experimental method as a means of informing public policies. Whether—and to what extent—insights from a research study scale to the level of the broader public is, in many situations, based on blind faith. This scale-up problem can lead to a vast waste of resources, a missed opportunity to improve people’s lives, and a diminution in the public’s trust in the scientific method’s ability to contribute to policymaking. This study provides a theoretical lens to deepen our understanding of the science of how to use science. Through a simple model, we highlight three elements of the scale-up problem: (1) when does evidence become actionable (appropriate statistical inference); (2) properties of the population; and (3) properties of the situation. We argue that until these three areas are fully understood and recognized by researchers and policymakers, the threats to scalability will render any scaling exercise as particularly vulnerable. In this way, our work represents a challenge to empiricists to estimate the nature and extent of how important the various threats to scalability are in practice, and to implement those in their original research.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Feb 2, 2026

Diversionary Escalation: Theory and Evidence from Eastern Ukraine

Natalie Ayers, Christopher W. Blair, Joseph J. Ruggiero, Austin L. Wright, and Konstantin Sonin
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jan 26, 2026

Never Enough: Dynamic Status Incentives in Organizations

Leonardo Bursztyn, Ewan Rawcliffe, and Hans-Joachim Voth
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jan 21, 2026

Rational Disagreement

Nabil I. Al-Najjar and Harald Uhlig
Topics: Uncategorized