Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are a global public good, which makes it efficient to act globally when addressing this challenge. We lay out several reasons that high-income countries seeking to mitigate climate change might have greater impact if they invest their resources in opportunities in low- and middle-income countries. Specifically, some of the easiest and cheapest options have already been tapped in high-income countries, land and labor costs are lower in low- and middle-income countries, it is cheaper to build green than to retrofit green, and global targeting matters in integrated economies. We also discuss economic counterarguments such as the challenge of monitoring emissions levels in low- and middle-income countries, ethical considerations, the importance of not double-counting mitigation funding as development aid, and policy steps that might help to realize this opportunity.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·May 18, 2026

Valuing Disaster Prevention: Desert Locust Monitoring and Control

Joséphine Gantois, Anouch Missirian, Evelina Linnros, Anna Tompsett, Amir Jina, Gordon C. McCord, and Eyal Frank
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·May 12, 2026

Sentiment and Environmental Performance

George M. Constantinides and Maurizio Montone
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·May 11, 2026

Global Policy Spillovers: How Environmental Policies Propagate through Product Attributes

Koichiro Ito, James M. Sallee, and Andrew Smith
Topics: Energy & Environment