Research / BFI Working PaperOct 04, 2022

Three Criteria for Evaluating Social Programs

James Heckman, Jorge Luis García

This paper examines the economic foundations of three criteria used for evaluating the costs and benefits of social programs. Some criteria do not consider the scale of programs or address the costs associated with programs that expand or contract the total government budget. A recent addition to the list of evaluation criteria—the marginal value of public funds (MVPF)—does not adopt a social optimality perspective. It evaluates the optimality of expenditures assuming a predetermined aggregate budget without considering the social costs of raising that budget.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Jul 20, 2021

Athletes Greatly Benefit from Participation in Sports at the College and Secondary Level

James Heckman, Colleen P. Loughlin
Topics:  Higher Education & Workforce Training
BFI Working Paper May 22, 2023

The Economic Approach to Personality, Character and Virtue

James Heckman, Bridget Galaty, Haihan Tian
Topics:  Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper May 2, 2022

Measuring Knowledge

James Heckman, Jin Zhou
Topics:  Early Childhood Education