Research / White PaperApr 10, 2020

Using Quantitative Models to Guide Policy Amid COVID-19 Uncertainty

Policymakers look to forecasts or projections about the future evolution of contagion and subsequent fatalities to guide their policy choices. These can be best guesses or warnings about how bad things could become. These considerations factor into their decision making in at least informal ways. Epidemiologists no doubt have important insights that we all look to digest. Economists and other social scientists are quick to consider ways by which they can draw upon their current stock of knowledge to incorporate endogenous responses of individuals and businesses to various policy alternatives. Quantitative predictions of disease transmission under alternative policies and the resulting social behaviors, however, bring special challenges. The reason is that models require specific assumptions and ingredients that govern the dynamic evolution and consequences of alternative forms of social and economic interactions. Subjective judgements are unavoidable. There are unknown parameters to calibrate in the face of limited data. These challenges are pervasive in quantitative modeling that aims to support policy. The unique challenges of the COVID-19 global situation are what draws our attention as we witness and participate in this harrowing episode.

Additional Materials

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Jun 26, 2023

Monetary Policy Transmission Through Online Banks

Isil Erel, Jack Liebersohn, Constantine Yannelis, Samuel Earnest
Topics:  Monetary Policy, Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper Nov 5, 2020

Structured Ambiguity and Model Misspecification

Lars Peter Hansen, Thomas J. Sargent
Topics:  Fiscal Studies, Monetary Policy
BFI Working Paper May 23, 2022

Making Decisions under Model Misspecification

Simone Cerreia-Vioglioa, Lars Peter Hansen, Fabio Maccheronia, Massimo Marinacci
Topics:  Uncategorized