Using subnational data from 41 countries, we develop an empirical model of the mortality-temperature relationship that allows us to estimate effects where no mortality data exist and to account for the benefits of adaptation to climate. Importantly, we develop a revealed preference approach that bounds adaptation costs, even though they cannot be directly observed. Using future climate simulations, we compute a median willingness-to-pay of $20 (moderate emissions scenario) to $39 (high emissions scenario) to avoid the excess mortality risk caused by a 1t increase in CO2 emissions (2015 USD, 3% discount rate). Allocating these costs to 24,378 political units, we find substantial heterogeneity.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Jan 1, 2016

Will We Ever Stop Using Fossil Fuels?

Thomas Covert, Michael Greenstone, Christopher R. Knittel
Topics:  Energy & Environment, Financial Markets, Monetary Policy, Tax & Budget, Healthcare
BFI Working Paper May 9, 2019

Do Renewable Portfolio Standards Deliver?

Michael Greenstone, Ishan Nath
Topics:  Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper Jun 1, 2015

Do Energy Efficiency Investments Deliver? Evidence from the Weatherization Assistance Program

Michael Greenstone, Meredith Fowlie, Catherine Wolfram
Topics:  Energy & Environment, Healthcare